A Striped Armchair

a_beautiful_place_to_dieThanks to everyone who voted on which South African book I should read! A Beautiful Place to Die and A Time of Angels tied for first at 7 votes each, while Bitter Fruit and The Madonna of Excelsior ran a close second at 6 votes each.

So how to choose between the two first placers?! I’ve decided to read A Beautiful Place to Die by Malla Nunn for the Orbis Terrarum challenge, and since A Time of Angels by Patricia Schonstein deals with a delicatessen and food stuff (as I said in my description, it’s compared to Like Water for Chocolate and Chocolat), I’m taking it as the universe’s way of telling me to participate in Rebecca’s The Spice of Life Challenge.

Spice of LifeThe challenge is all about combining food and reading, which definitely works for me! And isn’t the button gorgeous?! It was just a matter of time until I succumbed. I’m going with the first level, ‘A Taste,’ which requires me to read two books from two different categories (fiction, cookbooks, nonfiction, and memoirs/essays/autobiographies) by the end of the year. For fiction, I’ve chosen A Time of Angels by Patricia Schonstein (obviously) and for nonfiction (the other category that really appeals to me!), I’ve narrowed it down to: Hunger: an Unnatural History by Sharman Apt Russell (Rebecca herself gave this a good review), Chocolate: a Bittersweet Saga of Light and Dark by Mort Rosenblum (which I first came across while doing research for my Science Books Challenge list), or Red, White, and Drunk All Over by Natalie MacLean (which the wonderful Dewey reviewed, but I can’t link to it because her blog’s down).

What are three-day weekends for?

Posted by: Eva on: July 3, 2009

Being peer pressured of course.

I was planning on writing a post about how awesome A Golden Age was and how it’s the next best thing to a flight to Bangladesh. But then I discovered that people are talking about me on Twitter and want me to join. And I really enjoyed the interview Stephen Colbert did with the founder. So I decided to bite the bullet.

I had the hardest time coming up with a name, y’all. I never before realised that my blog’s initials are ASA.

Here were the possibilities:
Eva (obviously taken: boo!!)
EvainanArmchair (looks weird)
EvaReads (succinct, but doesn’t have much catchiness)
EvaLovesBooks (maybe too long? Don’t want to make people type out a sentence just to talk to me)
EvaASA (lmao)
EvasArmchair (at this point I was Very Annoyed with not being allowed to use punctuation marks)
ArmchairEva (sounds vaguely perverted)
EvaLit (it’d been taken)
Yevinka (realised only works with Eastern European language speakers)

At this point I was thinking about quitting Twitter before I even began. But finally I decided to just pick one and go with it, and that one was

BiblioEva (I don’t like how my name is in the second half, but I do like all of those vowels!)

Then it took me three tries to type the security words in correctly. (Tell me I’m not the only one that’s awful at that!)

And now I’m on twitter. And have no idea what to actually do. But I’m here. :)

Ghost Hunters (thoughts)

Posted by: Eva on: July 2, 2009

GhostHuntersMany years later, William James marveled at the ineffectiveness of such scientific strikes against the supernatural. “How often has ‘Science’ killed off all spook philosophy, laid ghosts and raps and ‘telepathy’ away underground as so much popular delusion?” he would wonder ironically. As James noted, the ghosts kept coming back, the visions yet glimmered, the voices yet sounded. No matter how many times scientists evoked mental illness, dreams, fantasy, and stupidity as explanations for bumps in the night, people kept reporting them as though they were real.

I picked up Deborah Blum’s Ghost Hunters. on a total whim. I was looking up some other book-I can’t remember which one-and suddenly this popped on to my screen. It sounded intriguing, so I popped over to my library’s website and put a hold on it. As most of you know, though, I have quite a stack of library books asking for my attention, so I didn’t get around to actually opening it until three days ago.

And I found myself completely entranced.

The book is about a circle of Brits and Americans (mostly men, but there is one woman!) who in the last few decades of the nineteenth century decided to bring a scientific approach to the question of the afterlife. The most famous of those today is William James, one of the founders of psychology and brother to Henry (one of whose novels I’m listening to right now!). But there were also the creators of the British Society for Psychical Research: Henry and Nora Sidgwick (husband and wife), Edmund Gurney, and Frederic Myers. And the Australian Hodgson, who becomes the most dedicated researcher. It delves into everyone’s personal lives as well as their intellectual ones, which makes the book feel like a fascinating group biography as well. Since Blum is a marvelous author, though, she includes the larger pictures: the ongoing conflict between religion and science and the refusal by most scientists to even consider applying the scientific method to ’supernatural’ questions.

I discovered by reading the jacket that Blum won the Pulitzer Prize, for her book The Monkey Wars, which might explain why the book opens with a brief discussion of Darwinism! However, the vast majority of it looks at the efforts of these men and woman to try to get their research taken seriously, to try to pin down anything concrete about the afterlife, and the various mediums they met with along the way. As I already mentioned, Blum’s writing is wonderful. I’ve read quite a few science books since I’ve been blogging, many by science journalists (instead of actual scientists), and Blum has the best style of any I’ve read. There are no corny jokes here, or awkward moments of dry explanation. Instead, she really brought all of the people to life, and I felt as if I’d been able to pop into a time machine and visit with these late Victorians. When they struggled against the unexpected, unreasonable automatic rejection of their work by most scientists, I was right there with them.

Like Wallace before him, Crookes was naive about how his colleagues might see his paranormal investigations. He’d expected demands for replication, perhaps competition from those who wanted to conduct their own studies of [the medium]. He had anticipated criticism of the equipment he’d used, suggestions for better tests. He’d not expected to be slandered by anonymous report-or to see his friends slandered with him.

When they went to a sitting with one of the amateur mediums whose detailed knowledge was seemingly inexplicable or collected so many similar stories of ghostly visitations it defied probability, I marveled with them.

The man jolted upright in bed. It was four o’clock in the morning. Someone had just gripped his hand. The touch was as cold and thin as water. He exclaimed to his wife, startled by the feel of those chilly fingers. He caught a glimpse of a woman leaving; there’d been something about the way she moved, the set of her dark head, that had reminded him of his aunt. But the man and his wife were in Nottingham, and on this early June morning in 1880, the aunt was supposed to be on a steamer heading for the United States. He leapt up to check the front door on the house. It was on the chain. He returned, saying to his wife that he feared his aunt was dead. “You’re dreaming,” she replied. Her diagnosis was that he’d eaten too large a supper before going to bed. Two weeks later, they received a letter from his aunt’s soliciter. She had died at sea on the day that he’d felt that ice-water hand in the middle of a summer night.

When they had a moment of private grief, or joy, or weariness, I felt it too. The book spans several decades, covering the death of most of the principals. And as you might imagine in a history of afterlife exploration, when the various friends die, things get even more interesting!

While the history-being-brought-to-vivid-life thing was awesome, it’s not what made me fall in love with the book. That would be Blum’s attitude. There’s a true respect for these people and what they were trying to accomplish that simply rings true. Unlike a certain book I could mention that I loathed for its mocking, holier-than-thou attitude, Ghost Hunters doesn’t try to say that modern science always knows best. While Blum discusses the mediums that were exposed as frauds by the researchers, she also discusses the ones that weren’t. She shares the kind of stories that make you wonder, that don’t seem to have a ‘rational’ explanation outside of something supernatural, the ones that the researchers compiled in their study. And she leaves it up to you, the reader, to decide for yourself. At the same time, she’s not like “look! ghosts exist!” at all. I think her account was balanced and intelligent, and I appreciate an author willing to give the readership credit.

I’m not being very coherent, but I loved this book to pieces, and I think a lot of people will too. If you enjoy history, the Victorians, intellectuals (Nora spends her Egyptian vacation doing math problems with her brother-in-law, hehe), or the history of science (and scientific revolutions) you should read this book. If you don’t read a lot of nonfiction, but you’re looking for titles that read like fiction and still teach you something, you should read this book. If you read non-fiction all the time and are looking for a new favourite author, you should read this book. And of course, if you’re curious about those unexplained, goose bump-raising experiences, you’ll want to go get this right away. Compassionate, intelligent, fascinating…Ghost Hunters is easily going to be on my top ten list this year. And considering it’s the 180th book I’ve read, that’s saying something.

Library Loot: July 1-7, 2009

Posted by: Eva on: July 1, 2009

library-lootLibrary Loot is a weekly event co-hosted by myself and Marg that encourages bloggers to share the books they’ve checked out from the library. If you’d like to participate, just write up your post-feel free to steal the button-and link it using the Mr. Linky any time during the week. And of course check out what other participants are getting from their libraries!

Want to share your loot? Marg is hosting Mr. Linky this week.

I promise I’ll add a vlog tomorrow. My car’s been in the shop (boo!), and my parents are on vacation so I have no other car to borrow, which means I haven’t been able to get to the library and grab the books waiting for me. It’d be kind of weird to do a vlog with no books, but the shop has promised it’ll be ready either later today or tomorrow, so I’ll be zipping over to the library and then happily vlogging about all of the great books. I even painted my fingernails in preparation (actually, vlogging has helped to break the horrible habit of biting my nails, which I pick up whenever I move and am therefore stressed), hehe. Until then, enjoy the short version via covers and links. As you can tell, I’ve once again gone into a library binge phase. I do have a defense, but I’ll save it for the video!

rowone
The Lightning Thief by Rick Riordan (originally for the OUAT challenge, now just for fun!), Black Juice by Margo Lanagan (because Tender Morsels was incredible), Tree: a Life Story by David Suzuki and Wayne Grady (for the Science Challenge)

rowtwo
Alphabet Juice by Roy Blount Jr. (for fun!), The New Moon’s Arms by Nalo Hopkinson (the Carribbean Challenge), The Future of Freedom by Fareed Zakaria (the World Citizen Challenge)

rowthree
Pemba’s Song by Marilyn Nelson and Tonya Hegamin (it’s a ghost story!), You Can’t Get There From Here by Gayle Forman (love travelogues, especially by women), Flygirl by Sherri Smith (because I really enjoyed Lucy the Giant)

rowfour
Scott Pilgrim Vol. One by Bryan Lee O’Malley (because of Chris), Betsy and the Great World by Maud Hart Lovelace (because of Kate’s shared excerpt), Ray in Reverse by Daniel Wallace (because I love him)

rowfive
In the Footsteps of Mr. Kurtz by Michela Wrong (the World Citizen Challenge), Freddie & Me by Mike Dawson (Dewey’s Books Challenge), The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde (GLBT challenge)

rowsix
Cranford by Elizabeth Gaskell (Classics Challenge), A Guide to Elegance by Genevieve Dariaux (for fun!), Agnes Grey by Anne Bronte (Classics Challenge)

rowseven
The House You Pass on the Way by Jacqueline Woodson (GLBT Challenge), Ella Minnow Pea by Mark Dunn (Southern Challenge)

Mid-Year Review

Posted by: Eva on: July 1, 2009

It’s time for a mid-year review! :) Rather than go through all of my statistics, I decided to just look at the goals I made on January 1st and see how I’m doing.

Translated Works
Goal: >13
Read so far: 19
I’ve already matched this one!

Classics
Goal: 25
Read so far: 8
I’m definitely behind on this one; I should have read 12 or 13 by now. But I just got several classics from the library, so I hope to catch up soon.

Short Story Anthologies
Goal: read anthologies instead of collections
Read so far: 2 (halfway through 3)
You know what, I think this resolution backfired. I’ve simply been reading less short stories this year. I guess I prefer collections to anthologies.

International Reading
Goal: more geographic balance
Read so far: I decided to do this one visually! I made no less than four maps: one for countries visited via fiction, one for countries visited via nonfiction, one for author nationalities I’ve read this year, and one that combines everything. I think I’m definitely balanced! However, I am quite embarassed that I haven’t read any fiction or nonfiction set in/about Canada. At least I’ve read some Canadian authors though!

First, I thought I’d post the ‘everything’ map: it includes 62 countries visited via fiction or nonfiction.
everythingmap

Getting into specifics, here’s fiction, which has brought me to 33 countries.
fictionmap

And here’s nonfiction, which has brought me to 48 countries (this is higher because of travelogues and all of the World Citizen books).
nonfictionmap

And finally, here’s the 33 different nationalities representing the authors I’ve read this year.
authormap

All maps were made at InteractiveMaps.org.

(For you Library Looters, Marg is hosting the Mr. Linky this week! My loot should be up later today; my vlog is delayed because of car trouble.)

A Guide to Elegance (thoughts)

Posted by: Eva on: June 30, 2009

A Guide to EleganceYou should realise that there are many men who simply adore doll-like women, and you ought to accentuate your appealing air of ‘a little bird fallen from its nest.’ Be delicate, extremely meticulous in your grooming, scatter-brained, tender-hearted, and helpless. And when you are old, be an adorable little lady always cuddling herself to keep warm. Men will want to protect you throughout your life, and you will always be spared the tiresome chores which your taller sisters are expected to cope with all by themselves. (From the entry “Handicaps-being extremely short”)

Despite the seeming ridiculousness of that excerpt, I truly enjoyed reading Genevieve Antoine Dariaux’ A Guide to Elegance. Imagine you have a dear old French grandmother, who is always impeccably dressed, taking you out to tea and giving you little bits of advice on elegance, mostly pertaining to clothes but occasionally including wider life issues. Of course, you’re not always going to agree with her, since she’s two generations removed from you (and pre-feminist movement), but much of what she says gives you food for thought, and even makes you approach your wardrobe in a different way. So it’s pretty simple to overlook her more dated views.

It is seldom possible to recognise a bargain at the time you buy it, because the true cost of a garment is not necessarily the sum that is marked on the price tag. In order to figure out how much it really cost you, you would have to take this price and divide it by the number of times you wear the article in question, and then accord generous bonus points for the pleasure, self-confidence, and elegance it may have given you. A dress marked down to half price and worn only once is sheer extravagance, while a perfect little custom-made suit costing six times as much and worn with confidence day in and day out during eight months a year for several years is an outstanding bargain!

The book was originally published in 1964 by Darnaux, a French woman involved in fashion and boutiques in Paris. She wanted to share her life experience to help other women love themselves and their clothes. In her own words, “If I may be permitted to use a high-sounding word for such a minor art, I would say that to transform a plain woman into an elegant one was, and still is, my mission in life.” It was republished in 2003, probably due to the popularity of makeover shows and books. It’s written as an alphabet book, with Darnaux’ thoughts and advice on 101 topics including Age, Colour, Girlfriends, Ideal Wardobe, Posture, Shopping, Travel and Yachting. The entries vary from a few paragraphs to several pages in length, with the more general/important topics getting more space.

If you consider that when you are far away from home and surrounded by strangers, you are judged entirely on the strength of your external appearance, perhaps you will realise the importance of being flawlessly well-dressed whenever you travel. Which means that your clothes should be perfectly adapted to your role of traveller and not give the impression that you are on your way to a wedding with a veiled hat and a fur stole-or, at the opposite extreme, toward the conquest of Annapurna with a knapsack on your back.

Even though it’s written alphabetically, it still has a nice flow, I suppose because there’s a strong voice and point of view throughout. Dariaux really is quite charming, and I enjoyed every page of this book, even the ones I didn’t agree with. (For any guy readers, are short women more attractive when scatter-brained and tender-hearted? Perhaps I should adopt a new approach to first dates!) It made me long for a smart linen skirt suit, which I have yet to find in a store, and affirmed my own femininity. I absolutely loved reading it, and I’d like my own copy for reference in the future (much of her advice really is wonderful, towards a simplified, high-quality, perfect closet).

One of the most striking differences between a well-dressed American woman and a well-dressed Parisienne is in the size of their respective wardrobes. The American would probably be astonished by the very limited number of garments hanging in the Frenchwoman’s closet, but she would be bound to observe that each one is of excellent quality, expensive perhaps by American standards, and perfectly adapted to the life the Frenchwoman leads. She wears them over and over again, discarding them only when they are worn or outmoded, and she considers it a compliment (as it is meant to be) when her best friend says, ‘I’m so glad you decided to wear your red dress-I’ve always loved it!’

I’d recommend this to those who love clothes (or wish they did!), anyone who adores old movies, any francophiles, anyone who loves the ton all of the excerpts I’ve included, and those who can include a grain of salt with their reading. It is definitely directed towards women, so I’m not sure if les hommes would enjoy it or not.

South Africa Reading List (and a poll!)

Posted by: Eva on: June 29, 2009

southafricamapThis is an old-fashioned style poll; vote using comments! Anyway, for the Orbis Terrarum Challenge, I’ve decided to stop in South Africa. But while researching South African books, I came up with too many that sound great! I’ve listed them, providing links to Powell’s (where you can read about the plot) and why I put them on the list as well as my hesitations: your job is to vote for the ones you like the best. You can vote for as many as you like, and then whichever title gets the most votes is the one I’ll read. Plus, if you’re curious about South African lit, now you have a bit of a jumping off place!

  1. A Beautiful Place to Die by Malla Nunn: first of all, Nunn was born in Swaziland! Yay for obscure countries! But no seriously, I watched a very interesting short interview with her about her life growing up as a mixed-race child and coming to terms with her heritage. She seems very intelligent and poised, which I like. The book is set just as the new apartheid laws go into effect (1952), which appeals to me. And while it’s a mystery story, it seems to tackle race issues head-on (an Afrikaner police captain is the victim, the detective is English and has a Zulu partner, and there’s discussion of the Immorality Act, which made it illegal to sleep with someone of a different race). My one hesitation is if it has too ‘hard-boiled’ a feel.
  2. The Syrgina Tree by Pamela Gien: this one has an intriguing origin: it’s a novel based on Gien’s one-woman play, which she performed to large crowds on Off Broadway for two years. It’s set in Johannesburg, where Gien grew up there, so I trust her authority. And the events cover the Soweto uprising, in which children of the slums apparently took to the street; I didn’t know that even happened before reading about the plot! But I worry that the events might just be emotionally manipulative (one of the main characters is part of the uprising and killed) rather than central to the story.
  3. Unconfessed by Yvette Christiansë : while I’ve read about slavery in the Americas, I’d never considered slavery in Africa itself. This book is historical fiction about a 1700s slave woman in South Africa, based on actual court records the author came across. Also, Christiansë is a poet, and I’m curious to see what a debut novel by a poet is like. That being said, I’m nervous it might be too poetic!
  4. The Madonna of Excelsior by Zakes Mda: I’m not going to lie. Going through my library’s South Africa fiction holdings was at times frustrating, because the vast majority of authors were white South Africans. I don’t have anything against them (I’ve known several), and I don’t think that they’re ‘less African’, but I couldn’t help but notice the lack of black South African authors and feel sad. Then I came to Mda’s books, which my library has several of, and perked back up. This one sounded the most interesting: it’s loosely based on a 1971 event, when nineteen South Africans were put on trial for violating the Immorality Act. It’s described as ‘equal parts satire and social criticism.’ I’m most concerned about how, as a male author, Mda portrays women.
  5. A Time of Angels by Patricia Schonstein: I’m attracted to this one because every review/synopse uses the phrase ‘magical realism,’ and it’s being compared to Like Water for Chocolate and Chocolat in that food is also important. And, it’s set in post-apartheid times, so it seems like race issues would be less central, which might be a nice change in approach. The thing that gives me pause is if turns out to be too ‘fable-y’ if you know what I mean.
  6. Bitter Fruit by Achmat Dangor: this novel focuses on how people deal with the atrocities committed during apartheid today, touching on the Truth and Reconciliation Committee. Since I’m reading a nonfiction book about that topic this month, it would be interesting to complement that with a fictional approach. Yet, I worry it will be too depressing, especially with that title.
  7. Nature Lessons by Lynette Brasfield: this one appeals to me because the protagonist is a woman now living in America, who must go back to her native South Africa to try and find her mother. So it’s a mother-daughter story (the mother was mentally ill), which I tend to love. And it apparently incorporates South Africa’s ‘natural beauty,’ which is the first time I saw that mentioned in a plot description. My hesitation would be that the plot is just too depressing; I can’t imagine growing up without a dependable mother.
  8. David’s Story by Zoe Wicomb: two big draws for me in this one: part of it is set in 1991 and deals with South Africa’s equivalent of the resistance. How exciting! The other part is David researching his family tree; I love family epics, especially ones with quirky members and stories, which this promises to have. I’m a bit worried that there might not by any plot, though.
  9. The Wedding by Imraan Coovadia: this is about a newlywed Indian couple who emigrate to South Africa. While I’ve read US/England Indian diaspora stories, I’ve never read one set in South Africa. It just sounds like a really interesting approach. However, I wonder if it’s too close to my ‘comfort zone’, and if I should be pushing myself more.
  10. Birds of Prey by Wilbur Smith: swashbuckling! 1600s! the high sea! Need I say more? But I wonder if it’s too superficial, and if it would be ‘real’ South Africa.

So there you go! All of the books have their pluses and minuses, which is why I need you to vote. Seriously. ;)

Sunday Salon: the Rollercoaster Post

Posted by: Eva on: June 28, 2009

The Sunday Salon.com

Well, thanks to last week’s answer post, I didn’t get to cover all of the books I’d read. So we’re in for another long post this week! But at least I can just do paragraph reviews rather than the interview thing. Unlike most of my posts, this one contains several books I didn’t really like, so the tone of my reviews feels a bit like a rollercoaster to me. ;) But we’ll start on a high note!

wesleytheowlI loved Wesley the Owl by Stacy O’Brien. O’Brien was a young biology researcher working at the CalTech labs when her mentor suggested she adopt a baby barn owl, Wesley. This book talks about their relationship. O’Brien obviously has a very deep love for animals, which really comes through in her writing. Getting to know Wesley through her eyes was fascinating! Additionally, since O’Brien works at CalTech for about half of the memoir, and I really enjoyed whenever she gave peeks of the ‘weird’ aspects of being in a science community. Parts of it amused me because I went to a liberal arts college that had more than its fair share of strange students, so I could identify with the atmosphere. But I found myself laughing loudly on more than one occasion, due to the stories she relates (and she compares CalTeach to Hogwarts several times, for you HP fans!). Most of the book is lighthearted and fun, but things take a turn in the last couple of chapters, as first O’Brien experiences major health problems, and then Wesley inevitably dies. I cried. I’d highly recommend this for animal lovers, people amused by crazy scientists, those desperately searching for a happy memoir, or anyone who’s hesitant about nonfiction. Just prepare yourself for a less than cheerful ending.

kampungboyI expected to love Kampung Boy by Lat. It’s a memoir of his childhood in a small Malaysian village. And it’s in graphic form! And Claire loves it. Unfortunately, I have to be honest: while I would have given the story itself five stars, but the drawing style repulsed me. The people don’t even look like people to me, just weird, part-animal, I don’t even know what. Now, Lat has a reputation as an awesome cartoonist, and other reviews I read written by people who understand cartoons are in awe of his drawing. So I totally admit that this is my problem, probably because I didn’t grow up reading cartoons/comics, so my eye isn’t adjusted to it. And I did love the peek in village life that Lat gave me. I’d probably read the sequel, Town Boy, if my library had it, but it’s not a book I’d read over and over again, savouring. Just not my style of art.

sleepwalkinglandIt took me forever to read Mia Couto’s Sleepwalking Land. Couto is a white Mozambiquean (?), and this story is set during the civil war. It’s a complicated format, with nested stories, and a definite magical realist flavour. All of that really appealed to me. But the style is just so bleak that I had to force myself to pick it up after I had set it down. And I was never sad when I had hit my fifty pages (I read in chunks), and I never went over the fifty. In other words, it was work to read this novel. That being said, I’m glad that I did. I got to see Mozambique, and in the less depressing scenes, I could feel some of the flavour of life. Recommended for those who are willing to be sad in order to read a novel set in Mozambique!

myinventedcountryOn the other hand, I raced through My Invented Country by Isabel Allende. She’s one of my favourite novelists, so reading this memoir about (for the most part) Chile was a real treat. And the narrative tone definitely felt familiar from her fiction; I like it when authors have a consistent voice. I didn’t know much about Chile before reading this, so I felt privileged to have such an insightful and intelligent guide. And her family story is almost as crazy as the ones you find in her novels! :) Reading this is like having a close friend over for tea, and listening to her life story. You’ll laugh, you’ll cry, and you’ll find yourself nodding your head a lot. And of course, by the end, you’ll want to read her whole oevre! Recommended for everyone.

therednecklaceAfter Sleepwalking Land, I needed a fictional break. So I turned to Sally Gardner’s The Red Necklace. I adored her first novel, Coriander (about a young girl who gets tangled up with faeries in Cromwell’s England), when I listened to it on CD a couple of years ago. This one is set during the French Revolution, and doesn’t have faeries, but it still has a driving plot, loveable characters, and more than a hint of magic. There are definite overtones of The Scarlet Pimpernel, but without the weird slang or absurdly dense heroine. ;) I didn’t love it as much as Coriander, but it was still a thumping good read, and I plan on reading the next one (The Silver Blade). I’d recommend it for those who enjoy younger YA stories, historical urban fantasy (like Sorcery and Cecilia), magical gypsies, or of course The Scarlet Pimpernel!

antoinesalphabetI picked up Antoine’s Alphabet by Jed Perl because of the pretty cover, and since it was about Watteau, I assumed I could use it for the Art History challenge. But this isn’t a biography of Watteau at all. It’s more like Watteau is the jumping off point for Perl’s imagination. Rather as if you and an intelligent professor went out for a few drinks, and the professor kept up a steady monologue, that got stranger as the drinks kept coming. And that was alphabetised. I enjoyed it in small doses, but mainly I was frustrated because Watteau seems like an interesting artist, and we only get glimpses of him. Pretension soaked the whole book, and even though it was little, it took me awhile to work through.

longtacksamFortunately, the next nonfiction book I picked up, Ann Marie Fleming’s The Magical Life of Long Tack Sam was wonderful. It’s a graphic memoir about Fleming’s quest to learn more about her great grandfather, who was a famous Chinese magician who toured the world, his Austrian wife, and their two daughters (one of them Fleming’s grandmother) who became integral to the act. Fleming is a film maker, and she made a documentary about his life, so I guess the book is a companion to that. It felt complete in itself though! Not only did I really enjoy learning about Long Tack Sam’s unique life, I thought the book’s format was perfect. It mixes cartoons with pictures with old posters and includes little things like timelines for the years; it felt so reader friendly and interesting. Highly recommended for anyone interested in fascinating, cosmopolitan families, magic, or who enjoy graphic memoirs.

choosingyouI was on a bit of a memoir kick, so I picked up Choosing You by Alexandra Soiseth. In it, she recounts how she got to be thirty-eight, single, and determined to have a baby, as well as the process of becoming pregnant (she went the sperm bank route), pregnany and labour, and having a newborn. This could have easily been banal (Soiseth discusses her struggles with weight, her family issues, etc.), but Soiseth’s brutal and complete honesty instead made it a fascinating read. I also loved it because, at heart, it’s a story of the sisterhood of women. Once Soiseth is pregnant, she relies on her girlfriends to help her out, and of course they deliver! Highly recommended for those who enjoy peeking into other women’s lives.

mudboundThen I read my third southern book of the summer, Hillary Jordan’s Mudbound, which I was really looking forward to. I’ve read only positive reviews of it, so I’m going to say upfront that it seems most people don’t agree with me, but I wasn’t very impressed. Most of the characters felt like stereotypes (crochety, racist, sexist grandfather, strong black midwife, fifties housewife left to rot due to husband’s decisions, God-fearing, land-loving black man, etc.), the majority of the sad events seemed emotionally manipulative and ultimately extraneous to the plot (I won’t cite particulars, since it’d involve spoilers), and the whole thing just felt like it’d been done before. Also, while several characters took turns narrating, their voices all sounded similar; I often had to flip back to the chapter heading to see who was talking. Not to say it’s actually bad, I’d call it an average read, and I did like the parts about being a young black soldier in WWII. But it didn’t grab me, or challenge any of my viewpoints, or even introduce me to a society I haven’t ’seen’ before. I saw a Barbara Kingsolver quote on the front, and the flaws did remind me of The Poisonwood Bible, which I loathed and everyone else seems to love. So if you enjoy books like that or The Memory Keeper’s Daughter (which I also hated), I bet you’ll like this one. I think it’s much better than either of those, but it has the same feel, if that makes sense.

aletterofmarySince it’d been an up-and-down reading week, I took refuge in one of my favourite authors! I’ve been rereading Laurie King’s Mary Russell series this year, and I picked up A Letter of Mary, the third in the series. I loved the character development, especially Holmes’ and Russell’s relationship, and most of the book was tightly plotted. That being said, the ending wasn’t from a ‘traditional’ mystery ending, and while I found it refreshing (you mean the suspect doesn’t immediately confess all when confronted with evidence?!), it might annoy some. My own reaction, though, on finishing the book, was to want to grab the next one immediately. I find Mary Russell and her world immeasurably comforting, and of all the fictional characters, she’s the one I’d most want to be. I’ve gushed about this series a ton, though, so if you haven’t read the first one (The Beekeeper’s Apprentice), go out and get it already!

readingdiaryThe final book I’m going to talk about now is Alberto Manguel’s A Reading Diary. Now, I loved both A History of Reading (which I’ve reread) and The Library at Night, so I totally expected this to be a comforting, awesome book. Unfortunately, I barely enjoyed it, and I certainly wouldn’t recommend it as the place to start with Manguel. It’s published as an actual diary, with random paragraphs following one another in a kind of stream-of-conscious style (but with normal grammar). And for some reason, I thought most of the book just seemed pretentious. Like, I was actually rolling my eyes while reading. I may have even scoffed once or twice. Especially at his comments about “the English speaking reader.” There were a couple of months I thoroughly enjoyed (each month he rereads a different book), but for the most part I just felt sad. Also, there’s lots of political talk about Iraq (the diary was kept in 2002/2003), which I didn’t like at all.

So there you go, the ups and downs of a couple of reading weeks. Most of my five-star reads I either talked about last week or reviewed in their own posts, so my reading has been much happier than this post necessarily portrays! :) Still, out of the eleven books I talked about, I loved six and didn’t love five, so the overall balance is definitely positive. And reading, even with less-than-stellar books, is always a magical experience.

Summer Lovin’ Challenge

Posted by: Eva on: June 27, 2009

sumerlovinSorry about triple-posting in one day guys! But I’m a week into the challenge, so I really needed to get my initial post published. Promise it won’t happen again! -Eva

Jules of Jules’ Book Reviews is hosting the Summer Lovin’ Challenge. It runs from June 21-September 21, and calls on participants to reread a set number of favourites. Yes, I know, I’m joining another challenge! But this is one that will really help me fulfill one of my reading resolutions (reread 25 this year; I’m awfully behind). I’m setting myself a goal of seven for the three months, but I’ll probably keep using this list until the end of the year! And if I exceed it, that’ll be great! :)

  • The Moor by Laurie King: I’ve been rereading the Mary Russell detective series this year, and this is the next book! I might as well also toss in O Jerusalem, which is the fifth in the series. I read them all for the first time in 2007.
  • A Little Princess by Frances Hogdson Burnett: this is one of those childhood favourites, so I can’t give the exact year I read (and reread) it! But I reread The Secret Garden last year, and loved it just as much as before.
  • Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen: one of my favourite books ever, that I haven’t reread for a couple of years. I read it for the first time in seventh grade, so 1997, and I’ve been reading it ever since.
  • Beloved by Tony Morrison: I read this for the first time in 2006, the year before I began blogging.
  • The Moorchild by Eloise Jarvis McGraw: I loved this book around fourth and fifth grade, so 1994-95. I think I read it four or five times, if not more!
  • Daughter of the Forest by Juliet Marillier: my sister and I got the whole Sevenwaters trilogy for my mom for Mother’s Day one year when I was in high school, so 2001, 2002, and of course I had to read them too. :) I loved this one, and reading Marillier’s Wildwood Dancing this year reminded me.
  • The Unbearable Lightness of Being by Milan Kundera: I read this in high school, in 2002, and adored it. I wonder what I’ll think of it now.
  • Moon Tiger by Penelope Lively: for senior AP English, our summer project (2002) was to read a book that had win either the Booker or Hugo or Nebula Prize and do a project on it. Being me, I read several of each, but this one was hands down my favourite!
  • The Solitaire Mystery by Jostein Gaarder: I had a really close Norwegian friend when I lived in England, and for my birthday the year after I moved away (14, so 2001), he sent me this and Sophie’s World. I really enjoyed them both, but this one was my favourite!
  • Phantom of the Opera by Gaston Leroux: I read this for the first time with my mom when I was 11 and loved it. Then we saw the musical for my twelfth birthday! (I know I’ve told that story before on the blog, but it’s an awesome story that deserves repetition! hehe) Over the years, I’ve memorised the musical thanks to the recording I have, enjoyed the movie that was released a few years ago, but I haven’t revisited the actual book. It’s more than time.
  • To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee: I read this for the first time in seventh grade, 1997. I found a beat-up copy in a thrift store shortly after we moved to England, and I immediately adored it. I’ve read it a couple times since, but not for several years.
  • Pawn of Prophecy by David Eddings: in middle school and early high school (1997-2002ish), I was obsessed with Eddings, especially his Belgariad and Mallorean series (both feature the same characters). My mom owned them all and leant them to me and my best friend; I have have reread them at least three times. I’ve been nervous to revisit them, in case they don’t hold up, but it’s definitely time. If I enjoy Pawn of Prophecy, I’ll probably end up rereading the other four books of the Belgariad (Queen of Sorcery, Magician’s Gambit, Castle of Wizardry and Enchanter’s End Game) as well. I haven’t read epic fantasy in years!
  • The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman: I read this for the first time the week it came out last year! :) I just think it’d be nice to revisit it; it’s the only Gaiman I haven’t read at least twice.
  • We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson: other than the Gaiman, this is the only book I’m including that I read for the first time during the blogging years. I adored it and wrote a really long review. I’d love to reread it!

Once Upon a Time III Challenge Wrap Up

Posted by: Eva on: June 27, 2009

The generous and talented Carl hosted the third round of what is probably one of the book blogosphere’s most popular challenges! I completed Quest the Second, which called for me reading one book in each of four categories (fantasy, folklore, fairy tales, and mythology), and then there were some extras. :)

Books read (linked through to reviews):

The best book: Tender Morsels hands down. My other two favourites were The Fox Woman and Wildwood Dancing
Any new authors? Yep! Margo Lanagan (who I definitely want to read more of), Lesley Livingston, Sergei Lukyanenko, Kij Johnson (also want to read more of), Katie Macalister, Philippa Pearce, and Guy Gavriel Kay (I didn’t love Ysabel, but I think I’ll try another one or two of his)
Books I did not finish: None! I thought about abandoning Nightwatch, though.
What did I learn from this challenge? I already knew how much I loved fantasy. :) But I discovered several new authors that I’ll definitely be checking out in the future, which is great! And that I should read more fairy tale retellings. Also, I made a big pool at the beginning of the challenge that I’ll probably keep reading from throughout the year.

Looking for a particular review?

Try my review directory: you'll find books and short stories alphabetised by title and author.

Categories

Currently Reading

Shadow of the Silk Road by Colin Thubron
This is the first book I've read by Thurbon. I love his intellectual, distinctly British tone.
Country of My Skull by Antjie Krog
It's gotten a lot more depressing, but it's the kind of depressing that's necessary. Krog is a journalist and a poet, which I think explains the unusual style. It takes a bit of getting used to, but it's effective.
Portrait of a Lady by Henry James (on CD)
I'm So Mad at Isabel right now. So mad. And annoyed with James; I just don't buy that she'd reject an awesome guy and then accept a horrid one. Hmph.
The Arabian Nights, trans. by Husain Haddawy and The Arabian Nights:a Companion by Robert Irwin
I've stalled on reading the Companion, since it's now full of literary criticism (not my favourite topic), but I'm still enjoying The Nights! I've only got 150 pages left.
Children of the Night ed. by Gloria Naylor
I lost this one for awhile! But I've found it, so I should get back into the stories soon. :)

In Loving Memory

Archives

Visitors (since 10/26/07)

  • 131,169

Wanna tweet?

  • @pookasluagh I know that "But I want an Oompa Loompa NOW Daddy" feeling about books. I've been cranky all week not having my new holds. 2 hours ago
  • @pookasluagh I HATE it when that happens. And then they say "But we can order it for you ma'am." At least the library'll be open tomorrow! 2 hours ago
  • @coloronline I did it! I think you should do a whole long quiz on multicultural lit. It'd be fun, and expose us to new books/authors! 2 hours ago
  • @katesbookblog I know! I went to her site right away to make sure it wouldn't be four more years, lol. (I had it as an ARC too) 2 hours ago
  • @pookasluagh That would work! And you'd have something for her to sign. :D 3 hours ago