Posted by: Eva on: November 10, 2009
Today, I’m participating in an event sponsored by Eco Libris: the Green Books campaign. They’ve requested that I include the following at the beginning of my post:
Today 100 bloggers are reviewing 100 great books printed in an environmentally friendly way. Our goal is to encourage publishers to get greener and readers to take the environment into consideration when purchasing books. This campaign is organized by Eco-Libris, a a green company working to green up the book industry by promoting the adoption of green practices, balancing out books by planting trees, and supporting green books. A full list of participating blogs and links to their reviews is available on Eco-Libris website.
Awhile ago I received an e-mail asking me if I’d like to read and review a book published in an eco-friendly way as part of an environmental campaign. I, like most of us, happen to adore the earth, so I was more than willing to join in. Then, we received a long list with many enticing books. It was difficult, but I decided on Style, Naturally by Summer Rayne Oaks. It’s not only a book about how to be stylish and environmentally friendly, it’s also printed on recycled paper.
As long-time blog readers will know, I happen to love clothes.
(In fact, during the last read-a-thon I posted a picture of my closet as a mini-challenge about what we collect.) I also love reading about clothes and fashion, so I was very excited to receive this book. And I certainly wasn’t disappointed. First of all, this is a sumptuous publication. The end papers are of mallard ducks, and each chapter opens with a two-page spread of a photograph manipulated in cool ways. Throughout the book, there are photographs of pretty much all the products Oakes recommends, so I’d call it a coffee table book. If you’ve ever seen the Lucky Guide to Style, with its almost picture-book-for-grown-ups feel, Style Naturally is similar, just on a larger scale. And it smells wonderful. I know, odd to say, but true!
So what’s the book about? Essentially, it’s a catalogue of brands to check out for environmentally-friendly products of anything remotely style-related: clothes, shoes, jewelry, purses, make-up, beauty care, etc. with tips on making your habits more earth friendly. There are profiles of, and interviews with, designers of the various lines, which I thought added a nice touch. And throughout, Oakes explains how you can start making little changes to become more environmentally friendly, so that you don’t feel overwhelmed all at once.
I think anyone who enjoys style, who delights in the visual aspect of women’s clothes, will love this book. Oakes has done a great job of providing all of the information you could possibly need, including things it hadn’t occurred to me to ask about, in easily digestible bits. The use of photographs will help convince people that you can still be stylish while respecting the earth. And the chapters on beauty products cosmetics, which ask you to think about why you would put something on your skin, that’s going to absorb into your bloodstream, that you wouldn’t want to eat, are thought-provoking in a good way. That being said, my only issue with the book was in the chapter on skincare…Oakes implies that people whose skin break out might just want to take a break from all the products they’re using, and then their skin will magically become happy and clear. That seriously offended me. I’ve been dealing with problem skin since I was 12, and when in the past I’ve tried stopping using all products, my skin breaks out more than ever. And I didn’t appreciate being preached at by a former model.
But that was a minor flaw in an otherwise wonderful, fun, informative read! I highly recommend this if you have any interest in the topic, or just think you might be interested.
On a more personal note, thanks so much for all of the TV on DVD suggestions! I have several on hold at the library, and I hope that they’ll come in soon. I’m still quite sick (hence why this review is pretty short), but I hope to be able to catch up with everyone’s blogs soon.
Posted by: Eva on: November 8, 2009
Hello darlings. I’m posting from a nest of pillows with suitable heating pads distributed around, and I’ve totally got fibro brain so a review would just be silly.
But. My mom picked up Season One of BBC’s Robin Hood for me at the library yesterday, and it is so wonderful! I am completely obsessed! (Have now put second season on hold, and am eyeing the season three episodes available for free thanks to my digital cable…trying to resist them due to spoilers.) So if you too are searching for some great TV on DVD, I recommend it.
It’s a totally modern approach to the Middle Ages-there are all sorts of 21st century jokes, and Marian is an uber-feminist, and while there’s been lots of icky near-misses with torture and murder (after all, the Sheriff of Nottingham has to be evil), there’s been nary a hint of rape or threatened rape. I find that so refreshing; it’s a fun adventure series with tongue firmly in cheek and lots of eye candy. Wit, action, romance…what more could I ask for from a TV series?
Lord knows how long I’ll be sick. So would you like to recommend some TV on DVD for me to check out from the library? I own all of Bones, The Office, and Sex and the City, and series I’ve rented in the past and enjoyed include Pushing Daisies, Scrubs, and Frasier. Just make sure it’s not wildly popular, since I’d rather not be #100-something on my library’s hold list.
Posted by: Eva on: November 6, 2009
I’ve been pretty quiet around the book blogosphere this week, except for posting every day I needed to (which was every day since Tuesday!). Sorry about that-I miss y’all, but my fibro is acting up and my neck has been hurting badly all week. Yesterday, in the morning I thought it might be getting better, but when I woke up from a long-ish nap, it hurt so badly I couldn’t move it all and pretty much spend the evening in tears, watching my beloved Bones, and creating the perfect throw-pillow propping set up to read my books without any neck strain. This morning, it’s a little better but not much, so I’m going to be severely limiting my computer time! That means this review will probably be shorter than my normal ones; don’t take that as a sign that I didn’t enjoy the book!
Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue by John McWhorter is another book I read via review copy, and the publisher requested I post about it this week since the trade paperback edition has just hit the shelves here in the States.
This is a nonfiction book about linguistics, specifically about the evolution of English grammar. If you’ve been reading the blog for awhile, you probably know I’m a language nerd; I studied Latin in high school, and in college one of my majors was Modern Languages (primary: Russian, secondary: French). And yes, I took a linguistics class. So I was really excited about this one.
And I definitely enjoyed it; I think any language or grammar nerd would. But it wasn’t perfect, and I’m going to talk about the not-great stuff first so I can gush later. McWhorter obviously has an axe to grind with his fellow academic linguists, and sometimes he spends several pages whining about why the other linguists don’t agree with his theory, even though it’s perfectly obvious that it’s the only explanation, etc., etc., etc. (Yes, I rewatched The King and I recently.) Now, in an article in an academic journal, I’d expect that. But in a ‘popular linguistics’ book, that for the most part doesn’t delve into the technical, uber-academic stuff, it felt misplaced. Also, his whininess/frustration alienated me, making me less excited about reading the rest of his writing. Most of these passages were concentrated in the first sixty or so pages, which made me really nervous; fortunately, after that they become less common. But they’re still there, so you’ll need to be able to deal with some kvetching in order to enjoy it.
The book was so much fun though!
There are lots of pop linguistics books that look at English etymology (and McWhorter complains about that in his intro, lol), but Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue looks at the odd quirks of English grammar, and where they might have come from. I loved that; McWhorter obviously knows his stuff, and as he’s looking at Old, Middle, and Modern English, comparing it to the other Germanic languages, checking out some Welsh on the side, it was just delicious to be a part of. I was grinning from ear to ear. If you’ve ever studied another language and you’re a native English speaker, I bet it immediately made many things about English seem strange (like how we use ‘do’ in any interrogatory/negative sentence or why our verb endings only change in the he/she/it form). McWhorter has answers, based on a historical analysis of the English isles, and those answers involve not only Celts but Vikings too! (I love Medieval history.)
I also loved his occasional remarks about Russian, and the following passage had me howling with laughter (my parents wanted to know what I was reading):
English, as languages go, and especially Germanic ones, is kind of easy. …There is a canny objection one sometimes hears out there, that English is easy at first but hard to master the details of, while other languages are hard at first but easy to master the details of. Purportedly, then, Russian means starting out cracking your teeth on its tables of conjugations and case markers and gender marking, but after that it’s smooth sailing. Nonsense. English really is easy (-ish) at first and hard later, while other languages like Russian are hard at first and then just as hard later! Show me one person who has said that learning Russian is no problem after they mastered the basics-after the basics, you just keep wondering how anybody could speak the language without blacking out.
I think that gives you a good sense of McWhorter’s style too; he’s very down-to-earth and casual, even when he’s analysing grammar. It makes for a readable book that pulls you along.
I also love that McWhorter is firmly committed to the descriptive approach to linguistics (vs. the prescriptive one…basically, he thinks it’s nonsense to tell a native speaker that they’re saying something ‘wrong’). He debunks a lot of the generally accepted ‘rules’ of ‘proper’ English, and my favourite debunking involved using ‘they’ with a singular, gender-neutral meaning.
Take the idea that it is wrong to say If a student comes before I get there, they can slip their test under my office door, because student is singular and they ‘is plural.’ Linguists traditionally observe that esteemed writers have been using they as a gender-neutral pronoun for almost a thousand years. As far back as the 1400s, in the Sir Amadace story, one finds the likes of Iche mon in thayre degree (‘Each man in their degree.’)
So take that!
McWhorter actually devotes quite a bit of the book to debunking, and I literally squealed with delight when I saw the heading of chapter four: Does Our Grammar Channel Our Thought? Y’all might recall I read Spoken Here earlier this year and absolutely, positively hated it. A lot of why I hated it is that the author (who isn’t a linguist) is totally gung-ho about the idea that a person’s native language actually shapes the thoughts they can have. I think this is ridiculous, and McWhorter agrees with me! If I could, I’d quote the whole chapter to you (he actually specifically references that other book, and pokes holes in the arguments). But I’ll settle for the concluding paragraph:
The idea that the world’s six thousand languages condition six thousand different pairs of cultural glasses simply does not hold water. The truly enlightened position is that, by and large, all humans, be they Australian Aborigines, Japanese urbanites, Kalahari hunter-gatherers, Cree Indians, Serbs, Greeks, Turks, Uzbeks, Amazonians, or Manhattanites in analysis, experience life via the mental equipment shared by all members of our species. No one is “primitive,” but just as important, no one is privileged over others with a primal connection to The Real.
Ok, my neck is seizing up again. So I’ll wrap this up: this book isn’t perfect, but I really enjoyed reading it, and I’d recommend it to anyone at all curious about languages. Going through McWhorter’s backlist, I realised I’ve actually read another book by him several years ago (The Power of Babel), and there are several more that I now have my eye on.
Do you have a favourite academic interest that you also read popular nonfiction books about? What is it, and what book would you recommend as a introduction to the field? (Yes-I’m now in all-out nerd mode and need more suggestions!)
Posted by: Eva on: November 5, 2009
A couple months ago, in a fit of apparent insanity, I decided to accept a few review copies again. And for some reason, I accepted this book without reading the first few pages online, even though I usually research and screen review copies offered me rather meticulously. But I’d heard good things about Garret Freymann-Weyr’s earlier novel My Heartbeat (which was a Printz Honor book)…and, all of this is my way of saying that I didn’t like After the Moment at all. In fact, after sixty pages, I realised it was too much effort to read the rest of the book. So I skimmed it, getting the salient details, and e-mailed the author to explain that I couldn’t write a positive review. In the past, when I’ve done that, the author has agreed that I should just not review the book at all. But Freymann-Weyr said that she still wanted me to review it. So, um, this is going to be quite a negative review, which I find awkward in the extreme. So know that I’m only writing this because the author wanted me to, and I would normally never analyse every single shortcoming of a book into exhuastion. But I can’t in good conscience recommend it. And let me tell you why.
The first problem for me was the clunky writing style.
Millie’s letter to Lillian arrived the next day. When Leigh got home-late, as he’d spent the afternoon at a swim meet, watching Astra destroy her competition-Lillian handed it to him, saying, “This is really for you.” It was two pages long. Millie thanked Lillian for coming to Seth’s service. She said she wanted to ask Leigh a huge favor, but first wanted Lillian’s permission. Or, rather, she wanted it to be very clear that this was all her idea. Neither her mother nor Clayton knew anything about it.
Have you noticed that almost all of the sentences are exactly the same length? And that there’s something stilted about them? Yeah-it’s like that throughout the whole book. I couldn’t connected with any of the characters, in part because the writing wouldn’t allow me to fall into the story. I wanted to pull out a red pen and start correcting, even rewriting, whole passages. (Oh, and Lillian is Leigh’s mom-he refers to his parents by their first name, which I found really odd.)
Of course, the other reason why I couldn’t connect with the characters is that they didn’t feel real. The story is told through limited third-person, from Leigh’s point of view (he’s a boy, btw). There’s a prologue when he’s 21, and then most of the book is told as flashback to when he was 17 (which I found absurd anyway, because doing a flashback to four years ago isn’t nearly enough time to make the idea of a more evolved, aware narrator work). But this is the most preternaturally aware high school junior I’ve ever heard of. He’s constantly telling you exactly what he’s feeling, as well as the feelings of everyone around him. I hate it when authors don’t trust me to figure out what’s going on, when they have to spell out every single little thing…it makes the story feel instantly fake, and if it’s one character’s voice doing the observing, that character becomes unconvincing. Here’s a tiny example (I’m trying not to spoiler anything yet, which is why I’m not picking more central bits) :
Astra’s father had invited her up to his house in Vermont for half of July and all of August, and Astra was beside herself with excitement. Her father lived in London and came back only in the summer, during which he might see Astra for a week or two. This summer, he said, he wanted her to meet his new girlfriend and to spend time with them. Leigh was glad for her, and happy she was happy.
There’s also this weird thing about the US war in Iraq running through the book (at least, the bit I read)…Leigh seems to actually be afraid he’s going to be drafted, and his parents discuss his options in moving to Canada. WTF?!?! I was in high school when the US invaded Iraq, and no one I knew was afraid that a draft was going to be reinstated. And the political observations of Leigh are painfully simple, which since I was a high schooler then, I feel comfortable saying sell the intelligence of 17-year-olds way short. Like this:
No matter how you got your news, it was pretty clear that most people did not feel the way Lillian and Astra’s parents did about the war. Most people were for it. Not in the world-the British Web pages told you that the world thought Americans were deranged cowboys-but at home. Leigh hated the idea of disagreeing with most of the people who lived in his own country, and so he read and listened. And kept his mouth shut.
But my biggest problem with the book is that it’s an ‘issues’ novel. You see, Leigh falls in love with a troubled girl, Maia. (I know at this point, this sounds rather like a John Green novel, but I LOVE both of Green’s books that I’ve read, because he’s a wonderful writer who creates living, breathing teens who are intelligent and funny and confused all at once. So don’t go there. lol) It’s not spoiler-y to say that Maia’s a recovering anorexic, because we know that right off the bat. It’s not handled the way it is in, say, Wintergirls, though…it just feels tossed in there to make Maia more interesting (although, like every other character in the book, she felt like a cardboard cutout). Oh, and have I mentioned that Leigh comes from a ‘modern’ family, whose parents are divorced and whose father is remarried, but his mom tries not to blame his dad for having an affair, because he’s ‘emotionally autistic’ and his new wife was a nurse who helped him connect with his emotions?!?! But we’ll leave that alone. Because after I realised I couldn’t read every page of the book, and began skimming, I discovered that the plot is like a Lifetime afternoon movie special. This will involve spoilers, though. So I’m starting a new paragraph.
So Maia and Leigh start dating, but then one night Leigh’s out of town visiting his ex-girlfriend and decides to stay there and comfort her (the ex). This upsets Maia, so she goes out drinking with a bunch of guys. Things get a little blurry, and she’s date-raped. And they film it. So Maia tells Leigh, but she decides she doesn’t want to prosecute because she wants to pretend it never happened so she can stay in her school. But then Leigh gets angry and beats the guy who raped her into a coma one day in the cafeteria. And Maia never speaks to Leigh again, because she trusted him with her secret and he ‘outed’ her so publicly.
This makes me SO MAD. I can’t even begin to tell you how upset I was to see such a horrible topic used for no apparent reason. There are wonderful novels out there, that handle rape victims with dignity and grace, where the rape is essential to the story and the authors are obviously exploring the issue in an attempt to help (Tender Morsels and Speak come to mind). This is not one of those stories. This felt exploitative and wrong. Maia’s nothing but an object.
There we go; that’s my thoughts on After the Moment and why I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone. There are marvelous YA books out there, that deal with important, difficult topics. That create real characters and make the reader live in their mind, inhabit their world. This isn’t one of those. You’ve got better things to do with your time. And I’m sorry again for writing such a negative review; usually, I try to keep my less-than-positive reviews much shorter, and I always point out the good things in a book as well. But honestly? I didn’t see any good things in this one (I take that back; the cover is a really pretty light jade). Take that for what it’s worth. If you’ve read this book, and disagree, feel free to explain what you liked about it in the comments. But if you say anything mean about me, I’ll delete it without a second thought.
How do you handle reviewing books you didn’t like? Are you like me, relegating them to ‘blurb’ reviews? Or do you prefer to do a longer review, so you can look at why a book didn’t work for you?
Posted by: Eva on: November 4, 2009
Library Loot is a weekly event co-hosted by myself and Marg that encourages bloggers to share the books they’ve checked out from the library. If you’d like to participate, just write up your post-feel free to steal the button-and link it using the Mr. Linky any time during the week. And of course check out what other participants are getting from their libraries!
Want to share your loot? Marg has the Mr. Linky this week!
I did record a vlog, last-minute yesterday (my sleeping schedule is all messed up again, so I didn’t even wake up until a couple hours before sunset)…I recorded it before I had had any caffeine, and I didn’t realise how tired and zoned out I was until I played it back. But I’m too lazy to record another one, so I apologise in advance for my more random than usual ramblings.
Title/cover/links format:

A Dark Dividing by Sarah Rayne (still in scary book mode!), There Once Lived a Woman Who Tried to Kill Her Neighbour’s Baby by Ludmilla Petrushevska (still in scary book mode!), From the Dust Returned by Ray Bradbury (still in scary book mode!)

Woman by Natalie Angier (Women Unbound Challenge), Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi (Women Unbound Challenge), The Restless Sleep by Stacy Horn (Citizen Reader’s book discussion)

Someone Knows My Name by Lawrence Hill (Canada Challenge), Still Life by Louise Penny (Canada Challenge), In the Skin of a Lion by Michael Ondaatje (Canada Challenge)

Green Grass, Running Water by Thomas King (Canada Challenge), Obasan by Joy Kogawa (Canada Challenge), The Cellist of Sarajevo by Steven Galloway (Canada Challenge)

David’s Story by Zoe Wicomb (international POC author), The Girl Who Played Go by Sa Shan (China Challenge), The Lady, the Chef, & the Courtesan by Marisol (international POC author)

The Maias by Eca de Queiros (Orbis Terrarum Challenge), The Girl with the Golden Shoes by Colin Channer (November Novella Challenge), Secrets by Nuruddin Farah(international POC author)

Little Star of Bela Lua by Luana Monteiro (November Novella Challenge), A Secret for Julia by Patricia Sagastizabal (international POC author), Where We Once Belonged by Sia Figiel (November Novella Challenge)

Wife of the Gods by Kwei Quartey (been in the mood for mysteries lately), Annie John by Jamaica Kincaid (November Novella Challenge), Ali and Nino by Kurban Said (international POC author)

La Perdida by Jessica Abel (just because!), A Long Way Gone by Ishmael Beah (What’s in a Name? 2 Challenge),
The Calligrapher’s Daughter by Eugenia Kim (just because!)

Hardboiled & Hard Luck by Banana Yoshimoto (November Novella Challenge),
Little Bee by Chris Cleave (new book club I’m trying out)
Posted by: Eva on: November 3, 2009
Hi guys! You know I don’t normally double-post, but I was surfing around the fashion blogosphere (remember that I told you I love clothes!), and came across a wonderful giveaway. The blogger behind Effortless Anthropologie is celebrating her first year of blogging by giving away a $100 gift certificate to Anthropologie, a store I love to visit although the only section I can actually buy from is super-duper clearance (not its official term), lol. I thought I’d share it will y’all in case there are some Anthro-fans reading my blog. (If so, let’s talk clothes! hehe)
Posted by: Eva on: November 3, 2009
I am so pleased to be today’s stop for the Classics Circuit’s inaugural author tour: Wilkie Collins. The brainchild of Rebecca the Classics Circuit aims to give classic authors the same five-star publicity treatment recently published authors receive, by arranging blog tours for them. Kim kicked things off yesterday with an informative look at serial novels and Collins’ role in them. And to see where Collins will be the rest of the week, check out the helpful schedule. Note that a different book is being reviewed each day, so be sure to get your fill of Collins yumminess!
I’ve been excited ever since Rebecca first suggested the idea of the Classics Circuit (I love me some classics!), but I was especially excited that Wilkie Collins won the poll. I read him for the first time in 2007, and since then he’s become a particular favourite. I’d already read four of his novels (The Moonstone, The Woman in White, No Name, and The Dead Secret), so when it came time to decide on a title for the tour, I popped his name into my library catalogue and read all of the book descriptions. Let me tell you, it was difficult to choose just one; Collins is a masterful storyteller, and each blurb sounded enticing. But in the end, I plumped for The Law and the Lady, in large part because its protagonist is described as one of the earliest female detectives in English literature.
It’s difficult for me to talk about the book’s plot, without giving away the suspense of the first volume. It opens with Valerie Brinton marrying the love of her life, Eustace Woodville. She expects things to be blissful, but early in the honeymoon she begins to notice strange things. Soon, she realises that her husband must have a dreadful secret, and she attempts to find out what it is. Now, having read the back-of-the-cover blurb, I already knew what the secret was, and I still enjoyed reading the first volume (about one hundred pages). So if you don’t mind some slight spoilerage, I can explain why she’s described as an early female detective. But feel free to pop down to the next paragraph if you’d like to go into the book blind. Ok, you’ve decided? You’re good with the spoiler? Well, Valeria discovers that her husband stood trial for the murder by poison of his first wife-and while he wasn’t convicted, he also wasn’t found innocent. He was tried in Scotland, where there was a third option: “not proven,” which essentially means the jury doesn’t want to commit. Obviously, there’s a lot of stigma attached to that, and Eustace runs away, too ashamed to live with Valeria now that she knows the truth. So Valeria decides to read the trial transcript, and track down the witnesses, in order to prove her husband’s innocence and save her marriage.
The spoiler-y bit is over.
Now I’ll tell you what made me love the book. I think Collins writes female characters wonderfully well, and Valeria was a perfect narrator. She writes in first-person, directly to the reader as it were, and I truly felt her pain and triumphs with her. Valeria is a stubborn, determined woman, and she’s not going to rest until she achieves her goal. That being said, don’t expect any kind of feminist ‘we are women! see us detect!’ kind of thing. Valeria is quite Victorian; her motivation for becoming a detective (of sorts) is utterly domestic, she’s blindly devoted to her new husband (despite his at times asinine behavior), she regularly references her gender in a self-deprecating way, and she is sometimes a bit dense. That being said, as a proud feminist, I still loved this book. For a Victorian woman, Valeria felt like a true hero; she stands up to the various male advisors in her life, and she travels about and puts herself in risky situations rather than give up. While her love for her husband is blind, I also found it admirable, and it never felt false, as if it was a mere novelistic device. I have friends today who are just as madly in love with their partners, and Valeria leaps off of the page to feel like a real woman. Also, since I mentioned how wonderfully Collins draws female characters, I must say I loved Valeria’s mother-in-law. It’s all too easy to stereotype mothers-in-law; something Collins uses to play into the reader’s prejudices in the beginning of the novel. But he subverts all expectations, by making the mother-in-law also strong and supportive, a true friend who gives her best advice to Valeria. It was nice to see a close mother/daughter-in-law relationship in literature for once! Most of the other characters are men, but they don’t come off wonderfully by any means. Collins is a Victorian, but I’ve never felt anything even vaguely misogynistic in his books. And if you’re a regular reader, you know I can be kind of sensitive to that stuff.
So, marvelous characters? Check! What else did I expect from Collins? A juicy plot of course. And oh, does he deliver. I’m not going to give away anything spoiler-y, but in reading this book you’ll meet a crazy man, get to read a scandalous trial transcript, even visit a war front. Now, it’s not like any of the Collins novels I’ve read are boring. But The Law and the Lady is easily the most fast-paced, grab-the-reader-and-don’t-let-her-go I’ve encountered yet. The cliffhangers ending chapters would do Michael Crichton proud. I read large chunks at a time, and couldn’t wait to get back to it whenever I had to put it down.
I checked to see when this novel was published, and I wasn’t surprised to see it came out in 1875, towards the latter third of Collins’ career. In this book, I felt like I was in the hands of an experienced writer, who knew what he wanted from his novel and how to get it. Besides, there are definitely some of Collins’ trademarks (trial transcripts, stories told by minor characters, melodrama) present in the book. I can’t say it’s my very favourite-that place still belongs to No Name-but this is a wonderful book, and I think it would be a great pick if you’re new to Wilkie Collins or if you’ve already read his more famous books and want to try more. I also think this would be a book to recommend for those skeptical about the classics…unlike some of his better-known works, The Law and the Lady attempts little overt social commentary or literary experimentation. Instead, it’s simply fun! Also, it’s pretty short (under 500 pages), and feels even shorter because of the page-turning writing and vivid characters. I’m so glad the Classics Circuit motivated me to read another book by Collins, because this has cemented his place as one of my favourite authors. Good thing I’ve got about 30 books of his left to explore!
Have you read any Wilkie Collins? What’s your favourite book by him? (Or which one’s highest up on your TBR list?)
Posted by: Eva on: November 1, 2009
Can you believe today is November 1st? I missed last week’s Sunday Salon (although I did a Friday salon, lol) in the post-Dewey’s Read-a-Thon, so I have quite a few books to talk about. I’ve decided to save the graphic books I’ve been reading for another post, but that leaves us with 16. So let’s get started!
My first read-a-thon choice was Disquiet by Julia Leigh, which is also my first book for the November Novella Challenge (yes, we were allowed to start early). It’s set in France, and revolves around a woman who’s come back from Australia to her ancestral children with her two small children. But all is not well; the woman’s brother and his wife have just had a stillborn child, the woman herself seems to be expecting something bad to occur, and the children are just trying to figure everything out. I loved how Leigh created an atmosphere of creepiness, and there are several scenes that I’ll probably always remember. I don’t have a problem with ambiguous writing that conceals more than it reveals (I loved Ishiguro’s A Pale View of Hills), but I think Leigh could have fleshed it out just a bit more to create an even more wonderful book. I recommend this to readers who enjoy ambiguous writing, or modern short stories (even though this is a novella, it’s ending was as abrupt as many of the stories I read).
Then I turned to an essay collection: Expat edited by Christina Henry de Tessan. Each essay is written by an American woman who lived (or lives) abroad, and for the most part they were excellent. A couple I didn’t enjoy so much, but I still loved this book! Most of the writing was both thoughtful and wonderfully descriptive; I defiitely added to the “countries I want to live in” someday list! I’d recommend this to you if you too have been an expat, if you dream of being one, or if you like reading women’s writing. After that I read Sherman Alexie’s Reservation Blues, which I’ve gushed about already.
A science book came next: Miss Leavitt’s Stars by George Johnson. This is a quite slim biography of Miss Leavitt, who worked as a ‘computer’ for Harvard astronomers in the early 1900s (she looked at pictures of stars and categorised them) and had several key insights, although she was ignored for her gender. It’s also an examination of a key time in astronomy (you’ll meet Hubble, among others!), and Johnson does a wonderful job of making the scientific theories understandable. His writing is lucid and interesting, exactly what I want from a science writer. And there are pictures within the text!
I think this would be a great place to begin for those that are new to science writing; it would also appeal to readers curious about women’s history or astronomy.
Then I turned to a book for the Lost in Translation Challenge: Chronicle of a Death Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez. Another tiny book (I stockpiled them for the read-a-thon!), I found this to be an interesting sample of Marquez, since I’d previously read (and loved) his longer novels and a journalistic-style look at FARC kidnapping victims. The book starts out with the death of the main character, and the rest of it examines why he died, and what everyone was doing on the day previous to his death as well as that morning. It’s an examination of machismo, and while Marquez doesn’t write from a political angle, to me it felt like an indictment of the tradition. I think this would be a great way for readers to try out Marquez, if they’re not sure about him. It’s written in his usual wonderful style, but it’s much shorter and without the magical realism (since it only covers two days). And for those who already love Marquez, it won’t disappoint!
The Creative Family by Amanda Blake Soule was an impulse library hold from me; after all, I don’t have a family. But I do love crafting, and I might have a family in the future.
Anyway, this book is one of the most wonderful, soothing, uplifting books I’ve ever read. Soule discusses how to bring creativity and craftiness into your home, and essentially calls for us to return to old-fashioned pleasures. I completely agree with her; I hate all of those plastic toys that pile up in kids’ rooms, and how there’s so much pressure to schedule every waking hour of a child’s life. But the book doesn’t dwell on those negatives; instead, it encourages you to go for the opposite. Search out one high-quality wooden toy instead of five plastic ones. Make sure your kids have space to use their imagination. You can’t overestimate the power of nature. Soule also includes specific projects you can do and list of resources in the back. I think anyone’s who is interested in parenting, or who disagrees with the ‘keeping up with the Jones’ mentality, or who loves bringing craftiness and nature into their lives will love this. She has a blog, SouleMama that gives you a good idea of her writing style, but I’d still recommend reading the book as well. I know I want to buy a copy for my shelves!
Still in the read-a-thon books, I grabbed Where are the Children? by Mary Higgins Clark (part of my R.I.P. IV pile). I didn’t like this at all, but that’s because when I started it I thought it was going to have creepy child ghosts in it. Instead, it had a p*dophile and a kidnapping. I don’t like any book that has that, so that was that. If you can handle that kind of stuff, this is probably a decent thriller; it all takes place over one day, and Clark ratchets up the tension. But the writing is nothing spectacular, and the characters felt a bit stereotypical to me (granted, when it was first published in the 70s, they might have been fresh).
Next up was Book by Book by Michael Dirda. I have a mixed history with Dirda; I think he recommends a lot of neat books and authors, but his writing style can veer into snobbish territory (from my persespective). This book had some really awesome book lists (and you know I love an annotated book list, hehe), but I think it could have been formatted better. Each chapter is a different topic, and it begins with 3-4 pages and straight quotes from other books, followed by Dirda’s own writing. I think it would have been better to break up the quotes more; they would have had more power and interest. Still, this was worth reading for me, and I definitely intend to refer to his suggested books in the future! I’d recommend this to people who love books about books and don’t mind the clunky format.
The rest of Dewey’s read-a-thon I spent reading graphic books, which I’ll discuss in a different post. So it’s on to post-read-a-thon stuff! First up is Hard Love by Ellen Wittlinger. This is a YA novel that I read for the Challenge That Dare Not Speak Its Name. It’s narrated by a high school boy in a suburb outside Boston, who discovers ‘zines and develops a big crush on a lesbian girl who is looking to escape average suburbia life. Included are excerpts from the various ‘zines, with cool formatting; I thought that was neat. I loved how Wittlinger captured that hopeless love that refuses to go away (lol) teens often experience, and I thought the narrator’s voice felt authentic. I’d recommend this to anyone who enjoys YA, or those sick of reading about girls falling in love with gay boys (hehe).
While I was cooking this week, I finally finished Status Anxiety by Alain de Botton, which I’d be listening to on CD. This is my third de Botton book this year; I love how he takes a philosophical approach to modern life’s problems. And I loved the topic: how our jobs and income determine our status, and how stressful that is. There were lots of wonderful quotes I wish I could share (that’s the downside of audiobooks), and I think in the end anyone reading it would feel inspired and happier about their life. My favourite part was when de Botton discussed how novelists have subverted society’s status expectations by giving us an insight into the lives and thoughts of the ‘lesser’ people. Oh, and did you know a possible origin of the word snob? At Oxford, they would note who wasn’t noble in Latin (sine nobilis) and was abbreviated s.nob. Fun, right? I’d recommend this to those who are sick and thus unable to work (well, that was my motivation for wanting to read it!), anyone unemployed or not in the highest income bracket that wants to feel better, or those who don’t believe in the rat race anyway.
I finished up The Texicans by Nina Vida after that. This was my attempt to give the Westerns genre another try, and I felt ‘meh’ about it. Afterwards, I discovered that Vida is a born-and-raised Californian, which makes perfect sense, since my main issue with the book was the complete lack of a sense of place. I consider myself Texan (lived there for about half my life), and I lived right near hill country, where much of the story is set. It’s a stunning landscape, one that makes you fall in love with it instantly, but that didn’t come across in the book at all. Even the descriptions of San Antonio (where I lived for years) were generic…the whole novel felt like it could be set anywhere in the west. I found that very disappointing. Also, I didn’t care about any of the characters; I was so excited beforehand that a bruja was a main character, and the book starts out focusing on her, but then it shifts and she falls by the wayside. And they all feel wooden, like archetypes rather than actual people, so I didn’t care about their struggles. That being said, the writing style itself was good. So maybe other people would enjoy this more than me. But if you’re a Texan, I doubt you’ll like this one.
Back to being positive, I next read Palace of Desire by Naguib Mahfouz, another Lost in Translation selection. This is the second in his Cairo trilogy; I read the first one (Palace Walk) two years ago and loved it. I don’t know why it took me this long to read the second one! Fortunately, there are enough years that have passed between the two books, and Mahfouz provides enough background information, that I quickly found my bearings. I loved this one just as much as the first one! It’s mainly focused on Kamal, the youngest son of the family who is just beginning college. Mahfouz captures the internal monologue of that weird time in life perfectly, and often things Kamal though had me laughing out loud in recognition. This is more of a male-centric novel than the first one, which was fine although I did miss the wife and daughters’ voices. I hope in the third one they’re given more prominence.
I can’t talk much about the plot without giving away quite a bit of the first novel, so I won’t. But I adore Mahfouz; he’s so good at making his characters live and breathe! And bringing 20s Cairo to life. There’s love and sex and family fights…the novel has the domestic, individual-people focus of Middlemarch, only from the male perspective (so maybe more like Trollope). I’ll definitely be reading the third one soon, and I’d recommend this to anyone who enjoys domestic novels, historical novels, or wants an insider pass to a different culture.
I have mixed feelings about the travelogue Adventure Divas by Holly Morris. Morris has been the TV personality in several PBS-style travel shows, and this is her memoir about a company she began with her mom to produce a new TV series, Adventure Divas that went around the world interviewing strong women. The chapters actually about the Adventure Divas trips are awesome! They go to Cuba, India, New Zealand, and Iran, and I found those chapters funny, inspiring, everything travel writing should be. But, alternating with those chapters, are chapters about Morris’ trips for other TV shows. And I didn’t like them at all. They had a ‘Look at me! I’m boar hunting with natives! Racing camels in Niger! Climbing a big mountain!’ feel to them that alienated me from Morris. And they weren’t about finding strong women, so they didn’t really fit in the book. Fortunately, they are the shorter chapters, and following each one was another Adventure Divas trip. For me, then, the bad chapters were balanced out by the awesome ones, and the book is well worth a read. I’d recommend this to anyone interested in women’s studies or travelogues, as long as you can put up with the author patting herself on the back a little too frequently.
I went into Connected by Daniel Altman, which I read as an economics choice for the World Citizen Challenge, with high hopes. It’s a clever idea; look at globalisation by taking one day and analysing a different headline, and visiting a different city, every hour. Unfortunately, it fell flat. I couldn’t figure out who Altman’s target audience was; most of the book was filled with somewhat technical and detailed discussions, that made me glad I’d studied microecon, macroecon, and international econ in college. But then there were ‘interludes’ that explained really basic concepts. It was odd. And Altman is a pretty extreme neoliberalist, so I didn’t agree with a lot of his economic views, which he presented as if they were fact rather than a paradigm. I can’t say I’d recommend this as a choice for the challenge, although I think it would make a really good discussion/book club pick!
We’re almost there.
I only have left the three books I finished up last night while sitting by the door for the trick-or-treaters. Ask a Mexican by Gustavo Arellano is a very tongue-in-cheek nonfiction read, based on Aurellano’s column in The OC Weekly. Most of the book is made up of questions-and-answers from his column, and while it’s often hilarious, it’s never PC. I can’t say I learned as much as I expected about actual Mexican culture, though, which disappointed me. I think if you didn’t have any Mexican/Mexican-American friends, this might have more interesting stuff in it, but it stays pretty shallow. It’s more a humour column than anything, and it did make me laugh. But as a woman, you should know that Aurellano’s lack of reverence definitely extends to gender, and the book more than a few off-colour jokes about women. I’m sure Aurellano doesn’t actually believe it, and the whole book is so off-colour, it didn’t really offend me, but it did make me raise my eyebrows.
A wonderful nonfiction book, that I’d recommend to everyone is Better by Atul Gawande. Gawande’s a surgeon, and this is his second essay collection about the medical field (you can see me gushing about his first book, Complications). While the topics in this book are different, Gawande’s thoughtfulness and marvelous writing style remain. I loved these essays just as much, and they definitely made me think; from looking at military medical personnel to doctors involved in lethal injection executions to medical incomes to more, Gawande doesn’t shy away from the controversial. But he looks at everything so thoughtfully, that it’s a joy to read. I can’t imagine anyone not loving his essays.
Finally, I finished Paper Towns by John Green. I read his debut novel Looking for Alaska last year, and enjoyed it so much I was nervous to try his other books in case they weren’t as good. Lots of bloggers convinced me to give Paper Towns a try, and I absolutely loved it! In fact, I loved it more than Looking for Alaska; it felt more innovative and original, and it has a road trip and all-night hijinks! It brought back some of my own all-night escapes from high school and college, as well as that freeing feeling that always comes at the beginning of a road trip. And the way the characters talk with each is witty and hilarious, but still realistic-it felt like how my high school friends and I talked. The book made me laugh, it made me think…Green transcends the YA genre, and I’d highly recommend this to anyone! However, I still don’t want to read An Abundance of Katherines, lol. It can’t possibly live up to this one.
Posted by: Eva on: October 31, 2009
In addition to finishing four challenges, I’m adding two more: this is the first!
The always wonderful Rebecca is back for a second round of the Really Old Classics Challenge from November through February, and this time she’s co-hosting with Heather of Age 30+…a Lifetime in Books. You only have to read one book written before 1600…but there’s also an option to get a ‘classicist’ certificate by reading three more books (so four total), and I have a tiny little pool of possibilities for that:
And then I saw on the blog that we could read retellings for extra credit! And Psyche and Cupid is one of my very favourite stories, so I’m tossing C.S. Lewis’ version Till We Have Faces into the mix.
Also, I’ve decided to up my involvement in Rebecca’s other challenge (The Spice of Life) from a taste (2 books) to a feast (6-8 books). Look for a couple reviews of cookbooks coming soon, as well as of course some nonfiction food-y goodness!