A Striped Armchair

Sense and Sensibility (thoughts)

Posted by: Eva on: May 21, 2008

I’m a big Jane Austen fan, but S&S is my least favourite of her books, so I hadn’t read it in quite a few years. But, partly spurred by reading her letters, I decided it was definitely time for a reread, and I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was much better than my memory had given it credit for! Sure, I still don’t care about the characters the way I do in my favourites (Pride and Prejudice, Northanger Abbey, and Persuasion), but Austen’s sparkling wit is alive and well!

I’ve decided that the best way to ‘review’ this book is to let that wit speak for itself. So here are my favourite passages, and why!

Here’s Marianne, with all of her sixteen-year-old idealism, describing her hypothetical future husband:

“I could not be happy with a man whose taste did not in every point coincide with my own. He must enter into all my feelings; the same books, the same music must charm us both.”

Doesn’t that just remind you of being a teenager, with all of that passion?! It also made me giggle because of that article that went around the blogsophere recently about dumping boyfriends who didn’t have the literary taste as you. Throughout the book, Austen treats Marianne with a gentle but definite mockery that was quite refreshing.

And here’s a scene when Marianne is talking with her potential new beau, Willoughby:

Encouraged by this to a further examination of his opinions, she proceeded to question him on the subject of books; her favourite authors were brought forth and dwelt upon with so rapturous a delight, that any young man of five and twenty must be insensibile indeed, not to become an immediate convert to the excellence of such works, however disregarded before. Their taste was strikingly alike.

More of that gentle mockery she does so well!

Here’s another quote from Marianne…apparently, I love it when she’s making a bit of a fool of herself! Remember that’s she’s sixteen:

“Undoubtedly. At my time of life opinions are tolerably fixed. It is not likely that I should now see or hear anything to change them.

I feel that Marianne’s character is just an exaggeration of traits we all had in our teens! I remember talking with a college professor when I was a sophomore (and eighteen), and he said: “I hope you remember this-how much fire you used to have for everything. Because one day you’ll mellow out.” At the time, I just kind of laughed, but even the space of four years I have calmed down quite a bit. Obviously, I still have things I’m passionate about, but I don’t get as worked up over little things as I used to. And that’s probably a good thing. :)

This last passage is a quote from Lucy. Lucy is a delicious little manipulative minx, in the tradition of Becky Sharp, who has it in for Elinor, and Austen caught her perfectly.

Elinor only was sorry to see them [Lucy and her sister]. Their presence always gave her pain, and she hardly knew how to make a very gracious return to the overpowering delight of Lucy in finding her still in town.
“I should have been quite disappoitned if I had not found you here still,” said she repeatedly, with a strong emphasis on the word. “But I always thought I should. I was almost sure you would not leave London yet awhile; though you told me, you know, at Barton, that you should not stay above a month. But I thought, at the time, that you would most likely change your mind when it came to the point. It would have been such a great pity to have went away before your brother and sister came. And now to be sure you will be in no hurry to be gone. I am amazingly glad you did not keep to your word.”

I love Lucy’s judicious employment of italics, and even though I’m a bit annoyed with Austen for not allowing her to be ladylike as well as vicious, I suppose it can’t be helped!

All in all, this is a wonderful book, but probably not what I’d recommend to people as their first taste of Jane. For that, you should go to her own favourite: Pride and Prejudice.

14 Responses to "Sense and Sensibility (thoughts)"

“Undoubtedly. At my time of life opinions are tolerably fixed. It is not likely that I should now see or hear anything to change them.”

lol! I remember telling almost the exact same to my high school philosophy teacher when I was 16 – this after a particularly passionate discussion in class where much inflexibility was shown by all sides involved. I remember that she just laughed and said “you’ll see”.

“I could not be happy with a man whose taste did not in every point coincide with my own. He must enter into all my feelings; the same books, the same music must charm us both.”

Oh god, I used to feel exactly like she does–but it simply won’t work. That’s why I’m still single! LOL I don’t expect my bf to read Dostoevksy, or anything at all. I believe what makes two people soul mates are the way they complement each other. I rather have someone who would kick me off the reading couch and go out to do things together. :)

S&S sounds like fun to read!

Right, now I have to go re-read Sense and Sensibility. Maybe that’s one for an audiobook re-read?

Such great quotes, Emily. I can see why they are among your favorites. I may be among the handful of people on earth who aren’t head over heels in love with Jane Austen’s novels, with the exception of Northanger Abbey which I like very much. I certainly respect her work and her place in literary history, but for pleasure reading Austen’s not high on my list. I do very much like the novels of Fanny Burney (who wrote just a few years later than Austen). Have you read Evelina by chance?

I’m saving Sense and Sensibility for a rainy day. I’ve read all the others and just can’t quite bring myself to facing a future without an unread Jane Austen book.

I do like the idea of having a partner with the same taste in books. Mine does not have the same taste I do. The only novelist he reads regularly is Virginia Woolf whom I cannot stand. (I admit, she’s a terrific writer, I just don’t like her.) Still, CJ and I are going on 12 years together.

BTW, Fanny Burney is before Austen. Austen listed her as a major inspiration. Evelina is a terrific book. It’s very easy to see how it inspired Pride and Prejudice.

Hi Eva– Your other commenter is right. Burney is chronologically before Austen (by 23 years), but she also outlived Austen (also by 23 years). In any case, Evelina is well-worth the read.

What I love most about S&S is that even though the sisters are nothing whatever alike, they have such a strong bond. For me it’s in a 3-way tie with P&P and Emma for the best Austen.

Nymeth, I know-wasn’t it great to be sixteen! :)

Matthew, I completely agree w/ you about soul mates. Whether my boyfriend reads or not is very low on the improtance list! In fact, I’m not sure it’s even there at all, lol.

Emily, I think that’d be a good audiobook, as long as the narrator wasn’t annyoing!

Toujours Jacues, well at least you like one of my favourites! And even though I’m a huge Austen fan, I can see why some people wouldn’t like her, and I don’t get upset by it or anything. :) I happened to just finish Evelina-I’ll be talking about it very soon since y’all brought it up.

C.B. James, there’s always Lady Susan! ;) I understand what you mean though. My most important ex-boyfriend to thought that reading fiction was a waste of his time. That didn’t stop him from being a great boyfriend though! As I mentioned, I just read Evelina, and I’ll be writing about it soon.

Toujours Jacques, I thought they were ontemporaries, so good to know the years!

Petunia, you’re right: the sisterly bond was very nice to see. :)

Great review! Yes, Marianne is like a teenager with all that passion.
My husband loves to read as much as I do and we spend alot of time discussing what our books and how they effected us. I know relationships are different as to what makes them work, but I cannot imagine ours without this element.

I’ve felt the same way as you about Sense and Sensibility for a long time–it’s never been my favorite, but perhaps it is time for me to read it again. Clearly there are benefits! I will have to pick it up again soon. Thanks :)

Time for a reread myself I suppose – somehow summer does seem the time for Austen, but only on the rainy days. . . Thanks.

Juliet Stevenson reads ‘Sense and Sensibility’ and does a great job. I listened at the end of last year. It is one of my favourite Austens; I think Emma is my least favourite (I await heckling with resignation).:)

Jaimie, thank you! That’s neat that books are such an important part of you and your husband’s relationship. Obviously, in a perfect world, I’d love to have that one day too. But I’d rather have a great guy who doesn’t read over a so-so guy who reads a ton any day of the week! :)

Gentle Reader, I was pleasantly surprised!

Andi, I love Austen all of the time. I remember I came across a blog post once where a girl talked about reading the different Austen books based on the seasons. I remember thinking her choices made a lot of sense, but of course I lost the link.

Musings From the Sofa, I’m not a huge Emma fan either (although I loooove the Gwenyth Paltrow movie version). So no heckling here!

I need to reread this one! I have watched the movie recently, but I really need to reread the book again. I remember enjoying it. Isn’t it nice to find that you like a book you didn’t remember liking as much before?

Leave a Reply

Looking for a particular review?

Try my review directory: you'll find books and short stories alphabetised by title and author.

Contact Me

astripedarmchairATgmailDOTcom

Categories

Currently Reading

Ruth by Elizabeth Gaskell (on CD)
I'm on CD 5 now, and Gaskell's so good at bringing characters to life! :)

In Loving Memory

Archives

Visitors (since 10/26/07)

  • 188,194

Wanna tweet?